Loz. Hello.

A lover of books. After a faff around Tumblr, not really understanding it properly, this will become a purely bookish blog. I like other things too.

Attempting to read 50 books in 2011.

 

Really interesting graphic. I wonder if there’s a similar one for the UK.
I still get confused about with Republicans being red and democrats blue.

soupsoup:

technipol:

Why Elections Matter In One Graph
Ezra Klein:
“I’ve been trying to figure out how to link to Timothy Noah’s series on inequality, which falls under the rubric of “things you should read that I have nothing to say about.” One thing I can say is that Noah, Catherine Mulbrandon and Slate have put an enormous amount of work into creating visuals to accompany the articles, and the results are really impressive. This graph, for instance, is the best visualization I’ve seen of Larry Bartels’s striking data showing how different income groups do under Republican and Democratic presidents.”

I think it would be important to note which party was in power, not just the president. Did republicans or democrats have the majority in either or both houses? This is sort of like using wins and losses to determine how good a baseball pitcher is rather than say, OOPS (what a great acronym)

Really interesting graphic. I wonder if there’s a similar one for the UK.

I still get confused about with Republicans being red and democrats blue.

soupsoup:

technipol:

Why Elections Matter In One Graph

Ezra Klein:

“I’ve been trying to figure out how to link to Timothy Noah’s series on inequality, which falls under the rubric of “things you should read that I have nothing to say about.” One thing I can say is that Noah, Catherine Mulbrandon and Slate have put an enormous amount of work into creating visuals to accompany the articles, and the results are really impressive. This graph, for instance, is the best visualization I’ve seen of Larry Bartels’s striking data showing how different income groups do under Republican and Democratic presidents.”

I think it would be important to note which party was in power, not just the president. Did republicans or democrats have the majority in either or both houses? This is sort of like using wins and losses to determine how good a baseball pitcher is rather than say, OOPS (what a great acronym)

  1. areid reblogged this from willess9
  2. quotingthecrisis reblogged this from think4yourself
  3. anindiscriminatecollection reblogged this from soupsoup
  4. other-stuff reblogged this from soupsoup
  5. juliebush reblogged this from soupsoup
  6. sean-p3 reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    Yes, but… this is kind of a big time period. At some point, it becomes pretty hard to avoid thinking that the...
  7. originalproxy reblogged this from think4yourself
  8. think4yourself reblogged this from sweetupndown9
  9. willess9 reblogged this from e-money and added:
    Why elections matter-
  10. anativegentleman reblogged this from soupsoup
  11. e-money reblogged this from soupsoup
  12. ainwonderland reblogged this from soupsoup
  13. lozhead reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    Really interesting graphic....wonder if there’s a similar one
  14. depechemoses reblogged this from soupsoup
  15. soupsoup reblogged this from technipol and added:
    “I’ve been trying to figure out how to link to Timothy Noah’s series on inequality, which falls under the rubric of...
  16. sweetupndown9 reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  17. openwindows reblogged this from technipol
  18. pantslessprogressive reblogged this from technipol
  19. faykejayke reblogged this from technipol and added:
    Wow. Amazing yet, sadly not surprising!
  20. technipol posted this